Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hunter Heck vs Fnu Nidunjianzan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Heck vs Nidunjianzan analysis and find out who is favored!
Hunter Heck vs Fnu Nidunjianzan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Heck 1 - 0 Nidunjianzan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Heck has won 55% of points on their second serve, while Nidunjianzan has won 36%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Heck, in recent form, has won 56.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nidunjianzan has won 34.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.86% and 37.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Heck has saved 78.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nidunjianzan has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Heck has won 60% of matches played (W/L 12/ 8), with Nidunjianzan winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Heck has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 17/ 21). Nidunjianzan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 15/ 7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Heck has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 10/ 7), where as Nidunjianzan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 6/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Heck winning 1 times and Nidunjianzan being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Heck winning 2 and Nidunjianzan winning 1. The last match between Heck and Nidunjianzan was at the M25 Decatur, 03-08-2022, First, Hard with Hunter Heck getting the victory 6-1 1-6 7-6(0).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Heck and Nidunjianzan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Heck winning 1 times and Nidunjianzan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Heck winning 1, and Nidunjianzan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Heck has played against opponents with an average rank of 203.45 while Nidunjianzan has played against players with an average rank of 116.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Heck has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nidunjianzan has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Heck has converted 52.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nidunjianzan has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
886
Rank
800
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
46% (24-28)
Career Total W/L
60% (29-19)
75% (3-1)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Heck VS Nidunjianzan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Hunter Heck | Fnu Nidunjianzan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:0 | 2:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (46/72) | 51% (42/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (37/46) | 69% (29/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (14/26) | 53% (21/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (32/82) | 29% (21/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Heck VS Nidunjianzan H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 1-6 7-6(0) |
Stats 
Hunter Heck
Player
Fnu Nidunjianzan
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
11
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hunter Heck | Fnu Nidunjianzan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (3/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 29% (2/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 67% (41/20) | 45% (38/46) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.46 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 19 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:11:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 227.25 | 239 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (110/170) | 67% (153/228) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (74/110) | 66% (101/153) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (33/60) | 36% (27/75) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (10/19) | 50% (7/14) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (68/154) | 37% (78/212) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Hunter Heck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Hunter Heck
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hunter Heck
Player
Jaimee Floyd Angele
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hunter Heck
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenta Miyoshi
Player
Hunter Heck
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hunter Heck
Player
Oliver Okonkwo
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hunter Heck
Player
Ezekiel Clark
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Hunter Heck
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hunter Heck
Player
Axel Nefve
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hunter Heck
Player
Andrew Fenty
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Fnu Nidunjianzan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Fnu Nidunjianzan
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fnu Nidunjianzan
Player
Phillip Jordan
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Fnu Nidunjianzan
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Fnu Nidunjianzan
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fnu Nidunjianzan
Player
Elmer Moller
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
52%
(
13 of
25)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
31
Total Points Won
19
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Fix
Player
Fnu Nidunjianzan
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
76)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fnu Nidunjianzan
Player
Mark Wallner
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
91)
2
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fnu Nidunjianzan
Player
Tom Gentzsch
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Carraro
Player
Fnu Nidunjianzan
79%
(
62 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fnu Nidunjianzan
Player
Davide Galoppini
63%
(
78 of
124)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
116)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
48%
(
60 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
55 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Heck Vs Nidunjianzan Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Heck are available here and Nidunjianzan photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
